Technical & Reference Section > Tech and Restoration

180mm or 175mm Crank Arms? Whats the point?

<< < (3/3)

Gish:

--- Quote from: MADD  DOGG on May 19, 2010, 04:22 PM ---BUNCH OF PERVS,,,,,3 POSTS AND ITS TURNED TO PORN

JUST FOR THE RECORD

I RUN 175 CRANKS AS I CAN SPIN EM A LOT BETTER THAN 180,S AND THE DIFFERENCE OUT THE GATE IS MINIMAL,,,ASK ANYONE WHO IS ON GATE NEXT TO ME

IF YA LANKY LEGGED ,,RUN LONGER CRANKS

RUSS  No 3

--- End quote ---
its not yer 175's we are watching out of the gate it's yer flecking elbows ya crank :LolLolLolLol:

Peter J:
I think at my age and level it makes no difference I’ve used 180’s and thought they were too long (I’m 5’ 9”) I’d be much happier with 175’s or even 170’s....I've got short powerful legs  :crazy2: so a shorter crank feels better for me.


TBH put a pair of trainers on with a thick sole or some deep caged pedals and that’ll add 5mm to your crankage.

bobafett:

I had 170's on my 82 supergoose rider and fookin hated them  :LolLolLolLol:

Got 180 redline twin pinch jobbies on her now and I love em - great cranks for a rider IMHO  ;)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page