BMX General > BMX Chat

Ur top 3 bikes from MK12

<< < (12/22) > >>

pickle:
That's what the medals were for.  It's never going to please everyone.

We did a survivor class a few years back but it was impossible to distinguish what was actually a true survivor  ???

A bike built with old parts is not a survivor in my book.........a survivor is a complete bike still as it was from BITD, warts and all just dusted down. It caused a lot of Grief so was dropped and I wouldn't think it'll be back.

Retrodan72:
The medal system failed Rob IMO as there was a bike with a medal on that had repop grips, the seat guts were on backwards and the cables were incorrectly routed.

It's details like that judges should notice.

That Swan Guy:
Rob, I agree completely with your definition of a survivor.

stidds:

--- Quote from: Retrodan72 on August 23, 2012, 08:09 PM ---There was nothing in the rules about bikes with repop parts not being eligible to win the S and S. ???

--- End quote ---


Of course there wasn't, however as a judge of the S&S if I saw a bike with orignal parts and one with repop parts then it stands to reason (and common sense) that the original one would place higher.

As for the 'medal system', I personally gave medals to bikes that I really liked regardless of the parts on them (whether repops or not), in my eyes it was an acknowlegment of a really nice looking bike.

However bikes with repop, completely era incorrect, etc is never going to win the one of the top 3 trophies.

Look at it this way, if I had a classic VW beetle and took it to a VW show and entered it in their S&S do you really think it would win anything if it had modern bucket seats, modern alloys, repop wings and doors etc?  Of course it wouldn't.

Retrodan72:
Fair point Sean. :angel:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod
Powered by SMFPacks Rates (Facepunch) Mod