Technical & Reference Section > Tech and Restoration

SYNSTRIP...LOVERLY STUFF..

<< < (9/9)

adenough:

--- Quote from: gavindavis on January 26, 2013, 10:38 PM ---Agreed!!  The raw finish looks great!  But would look full on "wammo" if you could stretch to get them chromed!  :daumenhoch:

--- End quote ---
mmm chrome mmm

deeman:
To be fair,they look nice raw Roger.Maybe just a coat of laquer? :daumenhoch:

adenough:
true true, dilemma time, oh well, no rush, i dont think the frame theyre goin on has even been made yet  :LolLolLolLol:

ozone:

--- Quote from: adenough on January 26, 2013, 11:42 PM ---true true, dilemma time, oh well, no rush, i dont think the frame theyre goin on has even been made yet  :LolLolLolLol:

--- End quote ---

What's the dilemma?  Can of lacquer £4 - chrome £40+ = no-brainer.   :daumenhoch:

Badbaldie:
chrome or lacquer   :-\    it all depends on the frame and forks / colour scheame .... lacquer might be the cheaper option but that few extra quid spent some times has to be done for the right finnish.... another thing to take into account is the chromer used ........ the "we the people " is nice and visable at the moment ... if you go down the chromer route you need to make sure he doesnt do to thick a chrome other wise you may loose that "look"   what ever you do they are loverly crank arms for sure  :daumenhoch:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page