BMX General > BMX Chat
S&M Neal Wood - which category @ MK ???
stidds:
--- Quote from: MartyC on October 20, 2014, 03:14 AM ---
--- Quote from: Dannywhac on October 19, 2014, 02:22 PM --- I just find it a bit disappointing that the minority of people who didn't agree with the dates to start with use threads like this to turn it into the same old date debates.
--- End quote ---
I was going to let this one die a death but having just noticed this point I feel compelled to respond to you Danny.
Firstly, I was not aware that the gods of BMX had decreed that the years of Mid School be redfined, but now I know I have to say I am very disappointed and not in agreement as is my right. You obviously are wedded to the opinion that because a few people agreed with you that you are right and despite this you are not entirely comfortable with your decision as you clearly try to shut down anyone that proffers an opinion that differs with yours or dare I suggest questions that ask about the rationale employed to arrive at your decision. If you were 100% behind your decision then you would ignore posts like mine or at the very least acknowledge the point and state why but instead you choose to try and belittle/dismiss any debate or questioning of your opinion by using the image of Captain Picard which to my mind is pretty insulting although I am pretty sure you didn't intend it to be.
--- End quote ---
Marty
This date/era etc is not up for discussion any longer. That was done a year ago and I said at the time that this was the last and only time it was going to be changed. Danny is shutting people down, as that is what the admin team asked him to do when he became the section moderator.
The Gods of BMX in this case were the members of radbmx, not Danny, not me, not the radmin team, we had nothing to do with the change. if you missed the change and the discussion then it is not our fault.
The members of rad wanted the change and that is what happened, not everybody will agree with the new dates and I am one of those members (I wanted it to be 1990-2000), we however made a democratic vote with the members of this site deciding with majority rule that a change was to be made and that is what has happened.
So this is to everybody.. NO MORE ARGUING/DISCUSSING THE YEARS OF MIDSCHOOL.
MartyC:
Laughable.
stidds:
--- Quote from: MartyC on October 20, 2014, 09:28 AM ---Laughable.
--- End quote ---
Which bit?
MartyC:
--- Quote from: stidds on October 20, 2014, 09:39 AM ---
--- Quote from: MartyC on October 20, 2014, 09:28 AM ---Laughable.
--- End quote ---
Which bit?
--- End quote ---
Most of it :LolLolLolLol:
I have to apologise for missing the original discussions and in a way I am secretly glad, both of my GT's, my 24 and my son's Expert are now mid school so really I only own one new school and I'm thinking that's questionable as it's a 2005 Felt Chronic. It's a little like buying a classic car only to find out that it's not actually a classic car or perhaps buying a new car to find out it's a classic car :-\.
stidds:
--- Quote from: MartyC on October 20, 2014, 10:00 AM ---
--- Quote from: stidds on October 20, 2014, 09:39 AM ---
--- Quote from: MartyC on October 20, 2014, 09:28 AM ---Laughable.
--- End quote ---
Which bit?
--- End quote ---
Most of it :LolLolLolLol:
I have to apologise for missing the original discussions and in a way I am secretly glad, both of my GT's, my 24 and my son's Expert are now mid school so really I only own one new school and I'm thinking that's questionable as it's a 2005 Felt Chronic. It's a little like buying a classic car only to find out that it's not actually a classic car or perhaps buying a new car to find out it's a classic car :-\.
--- End quote ---
What do you want? For us as a site to change everything back just because you don't like it? The members of the midschool section were asked if they wanted the dates changed as initially I put 1990-2000 when we set up the new site and people complained.
I asked for a discussion, after a decent period, we ran a poll to ask what dates people wanted. The majority won (that is what a democratic site does.. try to keep its members happy) and things were changed.
So basically you think that process and the decision of the people that voted is laughable.
This thread and this discussion has run its course now, if you want to reply to this message then I will leave the thread open for a short while, but other than that it is going nowhere.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version