BMX General > BMX Chat

Exchange my rider from 1985 to 1988

<< < (3/5) > >>

Ady:
Chrome moly frame on the 1987/88 sport with Dia Compe 990 Rear brake .
Much lighter than the FST but same size frame..
Keep your GT bud..
Again much lighter than both the above..
[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

senzo milano:

--- Quote from: Ady on March 21, 2016, 09:42 PM ---Chrome moly frame on the 1987/88 sport with Dia Compe 990 Rear brake .
Much lighter than the FST but same size frame..
Keep your GT bud..
Again much lighter than both the above..
[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

--- End quote ---

To late  :-[ already SOLD my performer

But i have more of these

I want to try THE haro for a while

If iTS not my think i look for something else

senzo milano:
On THE decals on my FST  is written full chromo  4130

Ady:
Yours is a `87 FST and should be trimoly frame which is chromoly front but rear trimoly..
But..
Yours might be a `86 sport but decals of a `87 FST..
Due to demand back then they used sport frames using the chromoly only decal..but decals for a FST ..
So you might have scored bud.. fistblump

He is the link..
http://bmxmuseum.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=43121

The later `87 sports had the rear 990 brakes.
I have `88 FST and the rear drop outs are flat with no foot platform.
The forks uses the haro standers fitted on the 85 86 masters and sports..
My `87 and `88 sports both have the foot platforms..
But the later type fork standers..

so a `86 sport with `87 FST decals.. :slayer:

OrgasmDonor:
the sport was longer, FST same TT as master, IIRC

I know you are not going to be jumping it but the fst is a much stronger and better handling and bigger/better fit frame than the GT and the fst feels better on a track than a sport, the sports are a little front heavy.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page