Technical & Reference Section > Tech and Restoration

Does it need to be all NOS?

(1/3) > >>

gaf16:
So, in the process of my first build for years.
Regardless of the frame used, should the parts be period NOS if possible?
Purchased some repro Dia-Compe brakes and seat clamp at the start of build.
Everything since has been NOS.
Now thinking of ditching the repros as, in my head, they are detracting from the integrity.
Have I gone MAD??
Or should I just stick with them??
Sanity check required please........!!

griff:
Personally I’d prefer lightly used / restored OG over repop
In particular those DC repop brakes
I’d rather have 80s LeeChi copies over those

Always exceptions though, eg I’m fine having repop tyres to skid about on

Ultimately it’s your choice but sounds like you have an idea...

Retrodan72:
I'd ditch the repop MX1000's anyway as they're poo.

As for everything being NOS? If you can find all NOS parts and afford them, then why not? Everyone is different and some will like to go down the NOS path. It's not for me as it doesn't suit my budget.

It's your bike built with your money and your imagination ultimately.

That Swan Guy:
It all depends on what you want.
NOS builds are fcuking expensive.
I’ve done an era correct survivor build and it was as hard to find bits but a lot less expensive.
At the end of the day it’s your bike and if you’re not happy go with what makes you happy.

oldschoolace:
I'm a fan of used/survivor parts which ironically can be harder to find than nos on occasion. I don't run with that era correct rubbish either. Would say your answer lies in what you intend the build to be. Rider, carpet queen, gentle Sunday tickle on a rad ride? Nos pool tires are a waste on a regular rider for example.
Would generally say avoid repop unless the whole bike is a "retro build"

You a big fan of chorlton then?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page