BMX General > BMX Chat
Makes of Top Line BMX's You Didn't Like
munners:
Haro's, just didnt look good to a 10 year old. I was a Skyway boy, even to this day i look at the logo and it makes me think, WOW!
The PK was always the bike that you had if you had a few quid. The welding always seemed chunky. It made it look expensive.
My uncle had a bike called a TRM (totally radical machine). I think it was a UK bike. It had Reynolds Tubing. Anyone remember????
theRuler:
baz keep used to ride a TRM in the early 90's
got a backyard vid of him doing a flip on one when he was 12
Zippy:
Two of the TRM riders lived in Worcester and would come to Malvern occasionally to ride our quarter pipe at the Hillbillies track.
I think it was Paul Heyfon??? that I toaught how to indian air. I actually showed him a can can air too but that was an indian air that went wrong when my foot slipped off the pedal in the air. Bloody rain. :LolLolLolLol:
OrgasmDonor:
Never liked hutch coz thought they where way over rated.
Redlines coz the geometry looked all wrong, they never looked sleek.
Quadangles coz the headtube looked and felt too high.
Diamond backs coz i always felt they where a wannabe pro bike.
gt performers coz i associate these with the start of the death of bmx in the mid 80's and firms competeing with sticking bits on frames n bendin tubes rather than ride or build quality.
Haro Gen 1, too slight.
Rippers, too weak n front heavy
not in any particular order and my attitude has changed slightly but still woulnt wanna ride any of them.
theRuler:
blimey
what did you like?
the hutch trickstar was an amazing bike btw.
and the GT performer's platform set the scene for the years to come. many many years
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version