Technical & Reference Section > Tech and Restoration

Era correct survivor part or NOS newer part ?

<< < (2/3) > >>

dannywhiteley:
I must admit I am also starting to go down the same route.  I just cant face 901's on my new 83 quad. 

However, either way which is worse, a newer (say late 80's with older parts) or an earlier frame with later parts?

Cos technically the older frames are more likely to have ended up with newer parts as bits were replaced / upgraded...

CD17:
What about re-furbed used era correct parts, check out these Tuffs....









Now for what these cost me, I could have got some of those new plastic hub Tuffs  :-\

But I would rather spend a little time, effort & money to get the build just right with the correct parts  8)

double chevron:
Can't only agree with that Chris  :daumenhoch:
Used parts often means refurbished, on my bikes. From obvious little cleaning to major operation....

bobafett:

--- Quote from: wish id kept my TA on January 13, 2009, 03:34 PM ---What about re-furbed used era correct parts, check out these Tuffs....

--- End quote ---

There's fook all wrong with using them beauties in my book  :smitten:

etriedes:
I tend to avoid the noss stuff now and go more for refurb, but at the end of the day go with what YOU want :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod
Powered by SMFPacks Rates (Facepunch) Mod