RADBMX.CO.UK

BMX General => BMX Chat => Topic started by: HARORIDER on August 07, 2010, 10:37 PM

Title: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: HARORIDER on August 07, 2010, 10:37 PM

what frame and forks is better?

RALEIGH AERO PRO BURNER

MONGOOSE CALIFORNIAN

if you can tell me why also then even better :daumenhoch:

and no burner jokes please :LolLolLolLol:

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: QUADROPHENIA on August 07, 2010, 10:41 PM

get a bmx mate, get a GT pro

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: stidds on August 07, 2010, 10:42 PM

Both shite.  Get something else.

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: dan-dare on August 07, 2010, 10:42 PM

If lucky heather worked, then gypsies wouldn't ride burners. :daumenhoch: :daumenhoch: :daumenhoch:

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: pickle on August 08, 2010, 07:47 AM

nowt wrong with either........gotta love a Goose  :daumenhoch:

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: sweetbeats on August 08, 2010, 07:56 AM

Like em Both. :daumenhoch:

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: hunterdubber on August 08, 2010, 10:04 AM

Aero Pro's usually sell for more  ::)


I've had neither Paul so don't know how they ride

but the Aero is basically a Laserlite( dropouts on forks differ) ,,,but with Burner decals


Both are full cro mo , not sure on the TT's but  I'd reckon they're both under 18.5  :-\

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: markyp on August 08, 2010, 10:46 AM

the cali was popular  back in the day simply cos it was a goose,the aero pro although a burner was a kuwi laserlite rebadged so was a great frameset,it just a shame that the name 'raleigh' could never back it up properly and do it justice(sorry burner fans)

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: Juju on August 08, 2010, 10:50 AM

Were the californians not trimoly - crom-mo front triangles and hi ten rear?

I thought they were the cheap "baby" of the range.

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: markyp on August 08, 2010, 11:03 AM

Quote from: Juju on August 08, 2010, 10:50 AM

Were the californians not trimoly - crom-mo front triangles and hi ten rear?

I thought they were the cheap "baby" of the range.

some of the calis were full chromoly but some were trimoly,i thought the experts were the babies?

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: hunterdubber on August 08, 2010, 11:20 AM

Quote from: Juju on August 08, 2010, 10:50 AM

Were the californians not trimoly - crom-mo front triangles and hi ten rear?

I thought they were the cheap "baby" of the range.

Yeah i thought they were Tri moly too , but the old adverts i checked said full cro mo frame ,,, no mention on the forks though  ::)

Title: Re: WHAT FRAME AND FORKS IS BETTER
Post by: OrgasmDonor on August 08, 2010, 02:00 PM

Quote from: dan-dare on August 07, 2010, 10:42 PM

If lucky heather worked, then gypsies wouldn't ride burners. :daumenhoch: :daumenhoch: :daumenhoch:

 :LolLolLolLol: