RADBMX.CO.UK

Mid School BMX (>87) 1989 to 2003 (<05) => Mid School ( Keep the faith ) => Topic started by: Bones619 on December 29, 2011, 05:40 PM

Title: Haro SR Group 1.0/2.0/3.0
Post by: Bones619 on December 29, 2011, 05:40 PM: http://bmxmuseum.com/bikes/haro/13642 (http://bmxmuseum.com/bikes/haro/13642)

http://www.bikepedia.com/Images/QBimages.aspx?itemid=90275&if=2000 Haro SR 2.0.jpg (http://www.bikepedia.com/Images/QBimages.aspx?itemid=90275&if=2000 Haro SR 2.0.jpg)

What is the general concensus of opinion of these lightweight Aluminium Y framed racebikes?
Title: Re: Haro SR Group 1.0/2.0/3.0
Post by: stuartD on January 05, 2012, 03:06 PM: I has the Group 1 SR2.0 24 Cruiser , great bike in my opinion , nice and light for a cruiser and stable over jumps/track.

(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/ll162/sdall35/HaroCruiser.jpg)
Title: Re: Haro SR Group 1.0/2.0/3.0
Post by: HEYWOOD BMX on January 05, 2012, 03:14 PM: :) I like `em,have owned 2.To some extent they were better than later models-on my 05 model the back end was so flexy that the back end would go round berms before the front,plus the seatstays flexed in by about an inch when the brake was pulled :daumenhoch:
Title: Re: Haro SR Group 1.0/2.0/3.0
Post by: boofy44 on January 05, 2012, 03:50 PM: i think they're ugly as fcuk but then i'm a purist/stuckinthepastboringoldtwat when it comes to bike frames.hate the look of the
modern carbon fibre road bikes too.i'll stick with my beautifully painted 96 thron tubing colnago.
Title: Re: Haro SR Group 1.0/2.0/3.0
Post by: HEYWOOD BMX on January 05, 2012, 03:54 PM: :) IIRC these used some daft size seatpost/clamp and used to piss me off that I couldn`t find better ones to fit :daumenhoch: