RADBMX.CO.UK
Technical & Reference Section => Tech and Restoration => Topic started by: firebird on April 25, 2012, 04:11 PM
-
I have some CWs here that are pro bars, 8" x 28"
Now these look small to me, they are pro bars. Did CW make XL pro bars? I've seen others that look really tall.
Any help would be great.
Cheers Steve
-
Steve,
Have a look here
http://www.cw-racing.com/pages/history-cw-products
Thought 28 x 8 was the pro size, not sure if they did any larger than that?
-
Ive been
Looking at that, they still look small. Theres a set or eBay, 9 1/2" rise. Can that be right?
-
Here's the only add i could find.
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/ll167/glynn9371/BMXA_8307_Page_41_grande.jpg)
-
Ok, the set I have look like the standard bars but the measure up as the pro bars,
I always remember my old CWs being a bit narrower at the bottom and not much of a flat part where the stem clamps on.
-
CW's also have diamond cut knurling, which is a great way to identify lookalikes and copies :daumenhoch:
-
yes, these are 100% CW bars, :daumenhoch:
-
9 1/2" rise. Can that be right?
That maybe a rough measurement of overall top to bottom, rather than centre to centre of the tubes :-\
-
Steve they are pro bars
You were smaller and the bars were bigger years ago :LolLolLolLol:
-
i've had about 5 or 6 sets of CW Pro's, they were all 9.5 Rise. (i reckon i must just measure from the absolute top to bottom ?)
I bought all mine from 4 cranks, and they said they were 9.5 also :D, bit conflicting with the add?
They all seemed a bit too large, i use mediums now, seem to be more in preportion.
Think cw's are way underated, and look good on most bikes
:daumenhoch:
-
i never liked the loook of them, but feel real comfy on a roll-around bike....
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/ii194/quattro2008/006.jpg)
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/ii194/quattro2008/007-21.jpg)
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/ii194/quattro2008/008-21.jpg)