RADBMX.CO.UK
Mid School BMX (>87) 1989 to 2003 (<05) => Mid School ( Keep the faith ) => Topic started by: Discostu on November 11, 2012, 10:07 PM
-
here is my latest build a 1990 haro team master. :daumenhoch:
i hope you like it. :)
(http://i1179.photobucket.com/albums/x398/rad-discostu/418.jpg)
(http://i1179.photobucket.com/albums/x398/rad-discostu/416.jpg)
(http://i1179.photobucket.com/albums/x398/rad-discostu/422.jpg)
(http://i1179.photobucket.com/albums/x398/rad-discostu/426.jpg)
(http://i1179.photobucket.com/albums/x398/rad-discostu/429.jpg)
a couple of pics with my 1989 team haro master. they are like twins! :LolLolLolLol:
(http://i1179.photobucket.com/albums/x398/rad-discostu/438.jpg)
(http://i1179.photobucket.com/albums/x398/rad-discostu/436.jpg)
-
stunning stu :smitten:
there aint two
your using a fooking mirror :LolLolLolLol:
-
like that a lot stu,wicked colour on the '90 8)
-
Lovely :smitten:
-
i was just about to say - hav nt i seen you on that before ?! :crazy2: :LolLolLolLol:
NICE
-
Simply stunning Stu!!! :smitten: :smitten: .....gimme gimme gimme :)
-
Nice work Stu, lovely looking bit of kit
-
Did it take you long to find those cranks Stu cos ive been looking for ages now :( ...The only ones I could find were some overpriced repro's from Japan which I wouldnt entertain.
-
looks spot on stu ;) 2 pairs of them cranks u greedy fooker. ;D looks puka mate :coolsmiley:
-
i actually have 3 sets!! ;D
the third set will be on sale soon. :daumenhoch:
-
Real nice that, love the colour :4_17_5:
-
I'm seein double....
Awesome bikes. :daumenhoch: :daumenhoch: :daumenhoch:
-
Very nice stu looks lush!, :daumenhoch:
-
Did it take you long to find those cranks Stu cos ive been looking for ages now :( ...The only ones I could find were some overpriced repro's from Japan which I wouldnt entertain.
you should have put a wanted ad up as I've just sold a set and not for stupid money!
-
Very nice Stu. :daumenhoch:
-
nice :daumenhoch:
-
looks nice mate :daumenhoch: :4_17_5:
-
Looking good Stu :daumenhoch:
-
Cheers for the comments lads. :daumenhoch:
Only 3 more bikes to go and I can retire! :)
-
the pedal end caps are different colours ... do I win a prize.
Tell me tho Stu... why did you want 2 the same? I would have wanted to do something different having got one already :) and total negative bike would have been cool ;)
-
Ed there not the same mate only little but 89 has a round bash plate and 90 has square :LolLolLolLol:
-
Ed there not the same mate only little but 89 has a round bash plate and 90 has square :LolLolLolLol:
s h i t ... will you stop pointing out all the stuff I get wrong ... OR NO NUTS!
-
the pedal end caps are different colours ... do I win a prize.
Tell me tho Stu... why did you want 2 the same? I would have wanted to do something different having got one already :) and total negative bike would have been cool ;)
The same??
Ones a black/chrome 89 and the other is a smoke chrome 90. ;D
One has a round bashgaurd (89) and the other a squarer one (90)
One has grip studs and a coaster mount on the chain stay (89) where the other one doesn't.
And one is longer than the other. (90 is longer than the 89)
As you can see they are nothing alike!! :LolLolLolLol:
-
Ed there not the same mate only little but 89 has a round bash plate and 90 has square :LolLolLolLol:
s h i t ... will you stop pointing out all the stuff I get wrong ... OR NO NUTS!
sorry :LolLolLolLol: also you told me writing the word shit without changing the S to a $ was naughty so don't break your own rules hahaha :LolLolLolLol:
-
If you wanted a prize you should have said the seat was wrong as a fusion one was fitted.
Also the front brake should be one of those wanky flexy nippons.
The pegs should be steel screw in ones in the front only. No rears were made. Not the incorrect airmaster type pegs.
And the seatpost should have been either a Haro fluted one or a fusion plain one.
But I don't care all the stuff looks right and is from around that era. :LolLolLolLol:
-
that looks mint stu even for a HARO ;)
-
Awesome build. :smitten:
-
Real nice them :smitten:
-
If you wanted a prize you should have said the seat was wrong as a fusion one was fitted.
Also the front brake should be one of those wanky flexy nippons.
The pegs should be steel screw in ones in the front only. No rears were made. Not the incorrect airmaster type pegs.
And the seatpost should have been either a Haro fluted one or a fusion plain one.
But I don't care all the stuff looks right and is from around that era. :LolLolLolLol:
I didn't want a prize.
God is in the detail I guess.
Better pics of the smoked chrome one please ... just looks black :)
-
Ed there not the same mate only little but 89 has a round bash plate and 90 has square :LolLolLolLol:
s h i t ... will you stop pointing out all the stuff I get wrong ... OR NO NUTS!
sorry :LolLolLolLol: also you told me writing the word shit without changing the S to a $ was naughty so don't break your own rules hahaha :LolLolLolLol:
thats it ... no nuts for Mr Squirrel :yahoo_silent:
-
Awesome builds there Stu :4_17_5:, i would love one of these ,,,,, but i'm not buying anymore now ,,,,,,,,, well i might ::)
-
Ed there not the same mate only little but 89 has a round bash plate and 90 has square :LolLolLolLol:
s h i t ... will you stop pointing out all the stuff I get wrong ... OR NO NUTS!
sorry :LolLolLolLol: also you told me writing the word shit without changing the S to a $ was naughty so don't break your own rules hahaha :LolLolLolLol:
thats it ... no nuts for Mr Squirrel :yahoo_silent:
I'm sorry:)