RADBMX.CO.UK
BMX General => BMX Chat => Topic started by: Gnarlyscoots on May 01, 2016, 10:21 PM
-
It's not my cup of tea, although I never really liked the 20" quad either.
The 29" Quadangle.
Would Scot approve ???
(http://i1078.photobucket.com/albums/w495/Freestylerider/13095794_10153874157323145_865088942840517135_n_zpsmcfqe8lw.jpg) (http://s1078.photobucket.com/user/Freestylerider/media/13095794_10153874157323145_865088942840517135_n_zpsmcfqe8lw.jpg.html)
-
Not keen on it one little bit "nono"
Im not totally against the re pop stuff but Quads should be 20" imo :)
-
It's got some good elements, I like the front end of a quad, but the tubing under the Bb shell looks thin & ugly and the stay tubes look too thin. Not bothered about 29"ers really. I think it's time for a vomitting emoticon.
-
(http://ic.c4assets.com/brands/scrapheap-challenge/series-3/945562bc-e59a-4281-8ea2-4bd66ae22428_625x352.jpg?interpolation=progressive-bicubic&output-quality=90&output-format=jpeg&resize=625px:352px)
-
Love 20"s, not fussed at all on 24"s & 29"s.
-
Can't stand anything above a 24.. :police:
-
Not a fan of this but 20" quads are amazing ... So inventive and such a fresh perspective in BMX design at the time .... Really forward thinking from Scot.. Genius :4_17_5:
-
Not my cuppa tea either. Thumbs down 20" yep anything over nope. :daumenhoch:
-
There great as long there old school 😉
-
As to "would Scot approve?" I'd say SE have bitterly disappointed long before these came along tbh