RADBMX.CO.UK
Mid School BMX (>87) 1989 to 2003 (<05) => Mid School ( Keep the faith ) => Topic started by: christhejob on June 12, 2007, 11:16 PM
-
bully bashguard frame
-
odyssey tko stem
-
Whitewall tyres
-
barefoot tyres! (please join us)
-
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/g171/jarvicseven/IMG_5126.jpg)
-
Morales BTS
-
ketch kharma
-
skyway tuff3's
-
Ace T.I.T.S.
-
rick thorne
-
jeezus, i've been sick in my mouth again!! twice in one night...
JAD SHERMAN (I'm not your friend, I'm a Piece of shieeeet)
-
94 haro megatube master in GOLD
-
Anything Mark Noble said was good.
-
Anything Mark Noble said was good.
hahahahahaha :LolLolLolLol: (sorry)
odyssey xtro forks and hub
-
Answer ProForx
-
and i quote, loosely
"regular 1inch threaded headsets with a clamp on stem are, of course, the future for bmx. who needs to bother with aheadsets that just come loose all the time"
menstrualcycles test, ride issue whocareswhen, 1996.
this launched my pseudonym "LC carambano", who along with "roberico muniche" (stuart king) took over the letters pages for a few issues!!
-
g-sport prongs (sorry george) or were they chesneys?!??!
-
hoffman condor (sorry, but it's true!!!!!)
-
2-Hip Pork
-
This is fun.....Xposure
-
the gary fisher "pure bender"
-
Hannebrink forks, remember the S&M 'Have Dank forks' ad?
-
Hannebrink forks, remember the S&M 'Have Dank forks' ad?
"mouth>sick"
odyssey black widow cranks
-
You lot are great at this. Makin me laugh loads.
-
Any and all Ruption
-
se racings marketing
-
tim march's nob
-
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/v432/Lazarou63/eek2.gif)
-
antix
-
hoffman condor (sorry, but it's true!!!!!)
You've gotta give us more than that..... why is the condor worthy of this thread?
Come on. Spill. ;)
-
S&M Kris Bennett
-
King Forks.
-
Can't have that Rob! What was wrong with King forks? come on! outside! (http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/v432/Lazarou63/fantastisch_01.gif)
-
:LolLolLolLol:
the terrible1 barcode
-
Can't have that Rob! What was wrong with King forks? come on! outside! (http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/v432/Lazarou63/fantastisch_01.gif)
Hehehehe.......
Thought that might provoke a reaction from someone ;D
I never understood the difference between snapping forks at the steerer tube and snapping a frame off at the headtube. Either way you're going straight to faceplant. All as I could see was a difference in cost. Back then, £300 a frame or so? Would have bought a lot of pitchforks......
-
THE original condors
pegmounts
geometry
a BEAST
-
1991/92 haro kneesavers... not fit to carry a shopping bag
-
S&M Kris Bennett
I had one of them for a while, mainly cos BSD Grant told me it was good. It was a total beast, I didnt like the droopy wishbone and the dropouts were too big.
It wasnt THAT bad tho!
-
I never understood the difference between snapping forks at the steerer tube and snapping a frame off at the headtube. Either way you're going straight to faceplant. All as I could see was a difference in cost. Back then, £300 a frame or so? Would have bought a lot of pitchforks......
Stuart was riding a full on standard Lengthy at the worlds in germany in 94ish. He was using king forks and he folded the whole front end of the lengthy on the massive spine ramp. It was a time when braking bike parts was big news, but no-one seemed to make that big a deal of it. I never thought Id see an early standard frame fold in half like an 80s frame.
-
hoffman condor (sorry, but it's true!!!!!)
:'(
-
S&M Kris Bennett
I had one of them for a while, mainly cos BSD Grant told me it was good. It was a total beast, I didnt like the droopy wishbone and the dropouts were too big.
It wasnt THAT bad tho!
Maybe it wasn't bad as i never rode one, I just thought it was ugly.
-
S&M Kris Bennett
I had one of them for a while, mainly cos BSD Grant told me it was good. It was a total beast, I didnt like the droopy wishbone and the dropouts were too big.
It wasnt THAT bad tho!
Maybe it wasn't bad as i never rode one, I just thought it was ugly.
The Haro style top tube to wish bone really didnt help, I hated that. It looked like the back end of the frame was sagging. I also didnt like the massive wishbone at the BB. Oh, and I didnt like the decals but I was able to change them.
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/r313/alexleech/parts%20for%20sale/Bennet_frame.jpg)
-
Wilkerson airlines frames........they Just looked soooooooooooo heavy and wrong!
-
Wilkerson airlines forks! I think they hit the ground if you cornered to sharp.
-
that lengthy that folded ,could be why they put the outer strength plates on ,like on mine.
back to topic - ultimate hardware products
-
Dirt Master. Ashley, 12 , barspin.
-
bmx rider
-
these KHE barends i saw... two bolts and two rawl plugs!!!!!!!
-
THE original condors
pegmounts
geometry
a BEAST
Fair enough. They were flawed. An icon, nevertheless ;)
-
it came to me on the way home... stuff that's meant to be good but was so so bad
THE HERRINGTON CRUSADER
:uglystupid2:
-
bmx rider
ahahaha, You said it! that's gotta be the winner?
-
WEIGHT :LolLolLolLol:
-
the schwinn hydramatic pro in an advert claiming schwinn weren't an mtb company cashing in..
the gyro on it was at 45 degrees to horizontal.........
-
ODYSSEY ROBOCLAMP
-
bmx rider
That mag was so bad! Did they do a second issue? I stopped after the first!
-
bmx rider
not as bad as that mag that had only 1 issue - think it was called grind or something, got it in the loft
-
Oy, nothing wrong with Grind! Go look again, it really was quite good (apart from the pages of product stuff)
Truth is, I cant really remember much about it but it was an OK mag
-
oh yeah so good they only did 1 issue :LolLolLolLol: i only sticking up for bmx rider as i know the guy who was editor
-
Ah, now, Im glad you said that. It was done by Future publishing. Only ever intended to do the one issue (partly why it was so big). It was some kind of test or show piece, not really sure how these companies work, but it was only ever going to be one. My mate worked on it, kinda like a big test and it got him a job at future publishing, and its probably why Im sticking up for Grind (ha ha)
-
Here's me thinking they were just cash-in attempts! I'm so cynical!
-
anything before s&m / standard.
it all fell to bits before that.
sorry
-
Ah, now, Im glad you said that. It was done by Future publishing. Only ever intended to do the one issue (partly why it was so big). It was some kind of test or show piece, not really sure how these companies work, but it was only ever going to be one. My mate worked on it, kinda like a big test and it got him a job at future publishing, and its probably why Im sticking up for Grind (ha ha)
OMG I remember that mag... Didn't you dress up as a flatlander in that mag or something Alex?
I'm gunna go dig it out.
-
Ah, now, Im glad you said that. It was done by Future publishing. Only ever intended to do the one issue (partly why it was so big). It was some kind of test or show piece, not really sure how these companies work, but it was only ever going to be one. My mate worked on it, kinda like a big test and it got him a job at future publishing, and its probably why Im sticking up for Grind (ha ha)
OMG I remember that mag... Didn't you dress up as a flatlander in that mag or something Alex?
I'm gunna go dig it out.
Ha ha, thats it. Rider sterio types. I was a gangsta flat lander with a vest on. I did a bit of scuffing on a double top tubed 16" bike (totaly faked pics). Loads of fun.