RADBMX.CO.UK

BMX General => BMX Chat => Topic started by: meticulous on November 19, 2008, 06:04 PM

Title: dont you think...
Post by: meticulous on November 19, 2008, 06:04 PM
redline built pretty much middle of the road frame and forks back in the early eighties, with not very well thought out geometry (forks angled too far forward, and seat post tube too laid back), but they came up trumps with the crank set, whats all that about? one of the cheapest framesets with one of the most expensive crankset, though i never saw a redline crankset on a redline frame in a shop window!!! :-\
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: kev-s on November 19, 2008, 06:34 PM
some companies manage to make one great product but seem to fail on other stuff they do and get known for that one certain product , for example peregrine made superpros which were the best 48 spoke wheels to have in the 90's yet there frames, bars etc never managed the same, profile are well known for there cranks but how many of there frames do you see, it is strange that some companies can come up with great ideas once but cant repeat that in other areas
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: ron burgundy on November 19, 2008, 10:19 PM
redline built pretty much middle of the road frame and forks back in the early eighties, with not very well thought out geometry (forks angled too far forward, and seat post tube too laid back), but they came up trumps with the crank set, whats all that about? one of the cheapest framesets with one of the most expensive crankset, though i never saw a redline crankset on a redline frame in a shop window!!! :-\

...idiot

(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/v337/2elliot/82carrera-1.jpg)

(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/v337/2elliot/CarreraII-1.jpg)

(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/v337/2elliot/PL24test3May83BMXAweb.jpg)

(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/v337/2elliot/1982-NoraCupRedline.jpg)

 ;)
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: Mattdub on November 19, 2008, 10:49 PM
 ;D

I ( as well as quite a number of others ! ) won lots of races on a PL20 bitd , a very good F+F  ;) .
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: electobooty on November 19, 2008, 11:06 PM
 :uglystupid2: :uglystupid2: ;D ;D
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: MartyC on November 20, 2008, 09:04 AM
Have to disagree with you there Sam, Redline made a range of bikes that covered the full spectrum of BMX.  Early Redlines and the PL range in particular were fantastic bikes and the PL20 Carrera was the top dogs  :4_17_5:.  The MXII was a much copied frame and fork combo and was a great ride to boot  :buck2:.
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: meticulous on November 20, 2008, 09:24 AM
oh! ok! it seems i am shot down, :2gunsfiring_v1:

 i was referring to the mx11 as i dont recall seeing anyone with a pl20, i think we had nothing but mx11's around here, and i had one myself, maybe that was a lower end speck frame and forks compared to the pl20, no offence intended... :daumenhoch:
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: OrgasmDonor on November 20, 2008, 09:50 AM
redline built pretty much middle of the road frame and forks back in the early eighties, with not very well thought out geometry (forks angled too far forward, and seat post tube too laid back), but they came up trumps with the crank set, whats all that about? one of the cheapest framesets with one of the most expensive crankset, though i never saw a redline crankset on a redline frame in a shop window!!! :-\

...idiot

 ;)

 :2funny:

i know where your coming from with the frame angles of the earlier stuff, but man, the pedigree n heritage speaks for itself and the frame geometry was well sorted and much more aesthetically pleasing by the time the PL's came out, hutch were the complete opposite, nice frames, fookin shite cranks! :LolLolLolLol:
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: ron burgundy on November 20, 2008, 06:17 PM
oh! ok! it seems i am shot down, :2gunsfiring_v1:

 i was referring to the mx11 as i dont recall seeing anyone with a pl20, i think we had nothing but mx11's around here, and i had one myself, maybe that was a lower end speck frame and forks compared to the pl20, no offence intended... :daumenhoch:

...just pulling your leg mate ;)

My old MXII was fantastic though... as is my MXIII...

(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/v337/2elliot/mxIII.jpg)

 :)

Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: jT Racing on November 20, 2008, 06:31 PM
love them levers, the bars look like they are sticking their thumbs up :LolLolLolLol:
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: meticulous on November 20, 2008, 07:15 PM
here's my mx11, candy red f+f+bars....  :daumenhoch:

(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/ii194/quattro2008/IMG_0925.jpg)

not quite finished though...
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: ron burgundy on November 20, 2008, 08:01 PM
Cool, what is the serial number?
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: MartyC on November 21, 2008, 04:49 AM
here's my mx11, candy red f+f+bars....  :daumenhoch:

(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/ii194/quattro2008/IMG_0925.jpg)

not quite finished though...

FFS and you thought that was pants?  :LolLolLolLol:

Fooking cracking looking bike, get it finished  :knuppel2:  :LolLolLolLol:

Love those levers Bren, would like to get hold of a right hand one myself  ::).
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: dialledbikes on November 21, 2008, 11:26 AM
The head and seat angles do look very slack compared to today's bikes (even compared to some old school bikes), but they didn't hold Stompin Stu back!
Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: Timmeh on November 21, 2008, 12:25 PM
Are the 500a/ 600a Redlines rarer than most OS bikes?

There are (or seem to be) lots of mongooses, skyways, burners about...do RLs have less of a following on the OS scene?

Title: Re: dont you think...
Post by: Mattdub on November 21, 2008, 12:47 PM
Are the 500a/ 600a Redlines rarer than most OS bikes?

There are (or seem to be) lots of mongooses, skyways, burners about...do RLs have less of a following on the OS scene?



Generally there were more 500a/600a models around than PL20's bitd because they were the more affordable entry level models ( in 500a case ) . I saw quite a few 600a's bitd , well specced & priced for club racers .

For numbers Raleigh sold thousands of burners , they were very visible & lots of "normal" everyday bike shops had them . There were other options but back then not many knew of them , I got a Pro Star instead of a burner because I did'nt want the same as lots of others .   
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal