RADBMX.CO.UK

Mid School BMX (>87) 1989 to 2003 (<05) => Mid School ( Keep the faith ) => Topic started by: reay900tap on December 16, 2008, 11:36 AM

Title: Taj bike history
Post by: reay900tap on December 16, 2008, 11:36 AM
stumbled across this, makes a god read

http://taj.transworld.net/2008/12/15/to-all-the-bikes-ive-loved-before/





deffo the best quote..
                                   'S&M Holmes again. I was on these frames for years. In fact most of the time I was on Standard, Hoffman, and Family I was just riding Holmes. '
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: SaMAlex on December 16, 2008, 11:49 AM
Thats brilliant!!!

So many great riding photos  :daumenhoch:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: GINGERHOLMES on December 16, 2008, 01:15 PM
that is one of the best interviews i have read  :daumenhoch: :daumenhoch:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: ron burgundy on December 16, 2008, 01:50 PM
That's a great read, and some fantastic bikes :daumenhoch:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: chromeOrange on December 16, 2008, 02:35 PM
Brilliant! Great rider and some great bikes...

Mark.
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: darkersomeday on December 16, 2008, 03:56 PM
great interview,
my favourite ever rider.
right up there with hoffman and haro,

mint to see the early bikes too, never realised he rode so many holmes with other sponsors stickers on!

but fook me,

that first t1 progression!!  how much do i want a t1 progression? :'(



T1 titanium barcode, i remeber talking to taj about it when he first got it made up!

i'm going to e-mail joe and see if he'll sell it to me! :LolLolLolLol:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: bmxmatt1974 on December 16, 2008, 05:15 PM
great read that  :)
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: SaMAlex on December 16, 2008, 06:36 PM
I love this whole interview/story. It really shows that for years everyone just rode whatever they could get, and most bikes were pretty crap. It also shows that even tho it broke, the Holmes really was an icon back then. Nothing else was close  :daumenhoch:

When Taj and Joe left Standard they called up S&M and both got Holmes frames. Moeller said that Taj had been getting given Holmes frames for years, it was only chance that when he "blew up" he was on a Standard. I couldnt help but think that maybe S&M should have pushed him more as a high profile rider, and also made more of a big deal about he and Joe coming back for a S&M frame. Im sure there was loads more to it all, but it was a shame most people didnt know how many riders were on S&Ms, wirh or without other peoples stickers on there.

When Rooftop left S&M for Family bikes (did they ever make a frame?), he got a Family bikes T-shirt, and had to pay for the dirtbikes that he'd been getting given before. A strange move, that one.
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: dialledbikes on December 16, 2008, 08:01 PM
Interesting read.  I'm a big Taj fan.

I'm surprised that Standard and Hoffman let Taj ride a Holmes with their stickers on though.  I wouldn't want someone on my team if they wanted to ride somebody else's frame.  Just doesn't seem right.
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on December 16, 2008, 08:29 PM
im getting an error 404 when i click on the link :(
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: SaMAlex on December 16, 2008, 09:50 PM
I wouldn't want someone on my team if they wanted to ride somebody else's frame.  Just doesn't seem right.


Yeah but Mike, you have got frames to give your riders. Standard didnt have many frames at the start (and they were heavy and short) and when on Hoffman Taj probably rode a Holmes while he was waiting for his frame. Its not like he'd ride a condor on dirt!
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: reay900tap on December 16, 2008, 10:48 PM
'Its not like he'd ride a condor on dirt!'

lets be honest, you would struggle to ride a condor on anything other than vert! :shocked:

I've always wondered how much it 'could' hold you back by running just one or two brands of parts through sponsership?
me myself, I'm very very picky on what and not whos parts I run, I think it would be a nightmare to be told 'heres your frame it maybe a bit long/short, with a horrible back end but please just make do'..
loving your bike, the way it feels & looks is 1/2 the battle to having fun on your bike!

so I say its his call,  with or without permission I can see his reasons, only thing I can't see is why'o'why S&M :idiot2: >:D
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on December 16, 2008, 10:59 PM
taj rode some dirt on a condor in madd matt......
 they are actually really good to go dirt jumping,park,street riding........and of coarse vert. just dont try and flatland a condor.diemention wise a taj is very similar to a condor.  i havent touched a dor to a vert ramp in 11 years....
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: teamsano on December 16, 2008, 11:01 PM
'Its not like he'd ride a condor on dirt!'

lets be honest, you would struggle to ride a condor on anything other than vert! :shocked:



not quite, butcher rode a condor when he first rode for hoffman, and he could boss his way thru posh with the best of them.
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: teamsano on December 16, 2008, 11:03 PM
.diemention wise a taj is very similar to a condor. 

wrong. nothing is very similar to a condor, apart from a bully or something like that, it has a ridiculous seat tube angle.
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on December 16, 2008, 11:06 PM
.diemention wise a taj is very similar to a condor. 

wrong. nothing is very similar to a condor, apart from a bully or something like that, it has a ridiculous seat tube angle.

thats about the only main diff
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/hh166/adamdawson/1997HoffmanBikes2.jpg)
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/hh166/adamdawson/1997HoffmanBikes1.jpg)
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: teamsano on December 16, 2008, 11:27 PM
yes, but note that the relaxed seat angle and a similar toptube length makes the condor a LOT  shorter in real life terms. over 1/2inch in the wheelbase as you can see.

also the condor had ridiculous o/d sized seatstays, and a frame design nothing like the taj.
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: bmxbert on December 16, 2008, 11:55 PM
lads is this not getting all a bit to technical....fact is all the bikes mentioned in this debate are great in one way or another...
want to debate go debate with new/old school boys. im pretty sure the 90s was the peak in bmx. anyone disagree with that???? :knuppel2:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on December 17, 2008, 12:00 AM
im just saying they ride kinda similar. (ive owned both a condor and taj at the same time) they can be ajusted to the same wheelbase in the dropouts and with the lax seat tube it just gives more room up top with the same tt length.

the condor had 3/4ths(the taj was bigger at 7/8ths) stays until 99/00 then they went way bigger after that in 2001
granted yes the frame design is different in the back but the front ends are nearly identical.(tubing and gusset and whatnot) and the general size of each other is close
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on December 17, 2008, 12:04 AM
im pretty sure the 90s was the peak in bmx. anyone disagree with that???? :knuppel2:

as far as best time in the sport,yes. as far as its popularity,no.  personally it was the best era,it was as pure as it could get and itll never be like that again  :'(
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: bmxbert on December 17, 2008, 12:23 AM
best era. and to be most popular soon for sure.... just not yet...
every time i show a rider from the 90s my bikes they instantly want to get into the builds... i just bought an old freind i used to ride with a taj frame for his birthday...
you can expect to see him on here by jan for sure...
there was so much trial and error and so much quality involved in all aspects....90s is defo where it was refined into the sport it is today.

then again what do i know im pissed as a fart :crazy2:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: nomad on December 17, 2008, 12:47 AM
what a great read that was, always loved watching Taj.

On the subject of condors, my mate had one which I once managed to pull a decade on. It was like being in space! I wa riding a Catweasle at the time, so it was a mighty acheivement imho! :LolLolLolLol:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on December 17, 2008, 02:52 AM
nomad,its definatly an acheivement doing a decade on a dor. they feel weird on them, it feels like your 20 feet in the air  :LolLolLolLol:

i cant read the blog. it says the page doesnt exist.
and this seems perfect for this thread...
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/hh166/adamdawson/SDC10434.jpg)
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/hh166/adamdawson/SDC10437.jpg)
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: Miko on December 17, 2008, 04:55 AM
I'm pretty sure I rode with Taj, at the track, right around the time that Revcore picture was taken.  That would be the reason for the helmet with mouthguard, long sleeves, gloves and frame pad.  The track and NBL rules were always loose for Taj. 

I also remembering him riding a tan Holmes, too.  I remember thinking his bikes always looked so slapped together.  Always had mismatched shit on his bikes.  But it showed everyone that having an expensive ass shiny Kastan with half a fork won't make you better at riding. 

I would just watch him as a kid.  He just sailed.  I looked up to him, Ed Bauer, and Geoff Ssengoba.  Taj got big-time after I pretty much walked away from the sport, due to a bad leg injury.  It was awesome to walk into Albe's once a year and see his signature goods.  Like a hometown hero. 

Albe's still has an original Hoffman Taj frame and fork.  NOS and 1" threaded.  I'm sure it means a lot to Todd. 
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: TwoBobRob on December 17, 2008, 05:52 AM
In amongst all of that I see that the Taj had a 75 degree head angle?   Blimey, never knew that...  Any other mid bikes with a steeper headtube?

Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on December 17, 2008, 04:29 PM
In amongst all of that I see that the Taj had a 75 degree head angle?   Blimey, never knew that...  Any other mid bikes with a steeper headtube?



yeah,flatland bikes  :LolLolLolLol:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: teamsano on December 17, 2008, 04:56 PM
i had a couple of taj frames, and they were really good, almost on par with modern frame dimensions (UNLIKE THE RIDICULOUS CONDOR) , i guess this was the turning point as far as riders designing frames started.

i have to agree with taj, as all the s+m's had back ends that were stupidly long, altho the taj was a LOT heavier than the dirt bikes i had been used to and i specced my bike the same as taj did by running 36's etc.
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: harris on December 17, 2008, 05:11 PM
i still have this taj  alex n stodgy had it but its been tucked away since i recieved it.
its a ramp room one not sure how much earlier they get.
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/d87/harris15570/100_0580.jpg)
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/d87/harris15570/100_0579.jpg)
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/d87/harris15570/100_0578.jpg)
it needs some loving oneday.
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on December 17, 2008, 05:49 PM
THE RIDICULOUS CONDOR........... :shocked: ::) ::)  :knuppel2:  :-X
 
  harris thats a sweet taj :daumenhoch: super fork/stem,phat jacks.... :smitten: :smitten:
 
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: lodge on December 17, 2008, 06:59 PM
I read somewhere that there was only two condor's ever sold in the UK   :LolLolLolLol:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: reay900tap on December 17, 2008, 07:14 PM
I brought a new condor  in 97ish, rode for a week or so before getting shot of it, didn't sell it iirc, I had to give it away!

only got it because I had a mk1 condor and liked it...
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: fugazi on December 17, 2008, 10:27 PM
I've had a couple of Condors, a 96/97 & the last one before those superfat seat stay jobbies, 99/2000? Great looking frames imho, but that low b/b that feels like it's too far forward in the frame takes some getting used to!
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: SaMAlex on December 19, 2008, 09:41 AM

Here is a link that goes well on this thread
UGP "Face Value" Taj Mihelich section

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5178313616516099716

In 1996 NO-ONE rode like Taj .... infact, have they ever?





(And yes, I am guilty of stealing links from my fav BMX web site. So what!  ;))
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: TwoBobRob on December 19, 2008, 03:28 PM
One of my very, very most favourite clips right there at 2.30 in - the music fits it perfectly   :4_17_5:

Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: harris on December 19, 2008, 03:35 PM
good drop in that alex ..just perfect 
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: showtime on January 05, 2009, 09:40 AM
WOW Dan, never knew you had a chrome USA Taj as well mate  :shocked:
thats 2 of us now  :daumenhoch:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on January 05, 2009, 05:28 PM
showtime,
 hope you like the test i put up. is there anyway you can get a good pic of your fork decals???  :) :4_17_5:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: showtime on January 05, 2009, 05:30 PM
er yeah
i remember you asked me before ages ago  :-[

i'm going to buy a new cam in the next week or so & i'll sort it out then  :daumenhoch:
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on January 05, 2009, 05:37 PM
its not a huge deal,just my forks are bare. much appreciated 8)
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: harris on January 05, 2009, 05:41 PM
mines only in rider condition adam is ok but well used.
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on January 05, 2009, 05:51 PM
yours looks pretty nice to me harris :)
 one of my superforks i de dedcaled years ago when the stickers got messed up and not many people have that style of superforks with those decals
its naked! lol
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/hh166/adamdawson/PA210349.jpg)
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/hh166/adamdawson/1997HoffmanBikes8.jpg)
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: showtime on January 05, 2009, 06:07 PM
i need to get you a decent pic of these Superfork decals here  :daumenhoch:

(http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL23/1877918/8354558/112136860.jpg)
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on January 05, 2009, 07:16 PM
i used to have the original box with that logo. that box they used for awhile. from the same gen we both have to the big dropout 14mm aheadset to the 3/8 dropout aheadset with the spelled out super fork.
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/hh166/adamdawson/DSC02667.jpg)
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: bmxbert on January 05, 2009, 07:38 PM
ive got a set of those with the red decals
mine dont have peg bosses though! there nos as well.got them from rory at a great price
finding a headset proves quite expensive if you want a gooden
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on January 05, 2009, 07:49 PM
im glad when i got this one it had the aheadset on it. these were the first of the aheadset. 14mm dropouts,pegbosses and with the flat not slanted stem. then they came out with the ones that say super fork on the side with the 1" aheadset and 1 1/8" threadless with or without pegbosses with the slanted stem.
do you have that box??
(http://www.radbmx.co.uk/archive/albums/hh166/adamdawson/SDC13157.jpg)
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: bmxbert on January 05, 2009, 08:02 PM
no no box they have never been built up though
im holding them back untill i manage to get some funds together to get a big daddy from harris.
it has original forks but ive always liked the 1" with clamps. yu get a nice stem that way.to me the old hb stems were one of the things that made hoffman so appealing
Title: Re: Taj bike history
Post by: condor96 on January 05, 2009, 08:16 PM
yes ive always liked the old hoffman stems
"stronger than a rhino on steroids"
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal