RADBMX.CO.UK

Old School BMX 1980 - 1988 => Old School Freestyle (frame stands and kickturns galore!) => Topic started by: aditup on July 29, 2005, 02:57 PM

Title: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: aditup on July 29, 2005, 02:57 PM

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7171172921&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&rd=1
Just wondering, thought it would have gone mad for this. Ad

Title: Re: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: ORB on July 29, 2005, 03:01 PM

wrong forks......

Title: Re: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: ORB on July 29, 2005, 03:04 PM

it would help if he spelled Performer correctly.

Also, i dont think it is a mega early one, it looks to have moe holes in the rear drops than the three it requires to be mega collectable.

ORB

Title: Re: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: theRuler on July 29, 2005, 07:25 PM

it's in a daft colour

Title: Re: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: aditup on July 29, 2005, 08:20 PM

All present and correct, just a later model. The forks are right, the dropouts are right, what you all didn't notice, is the seat tube has been cut down a little. That won't take much sorting. It is a post 86/87 model. When performers are changing hand for such silly money, £42 is a bargain. ;D $171 delivered ;) I wonder who won it ;) Ad

Title: Re: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: ORB on July 30, 2005, 01:15 AM

they aint the forks that was on my 86........

infact, i got an 87 or 2 here with diff forks?

Am i a mong?

Wanna buy a dog?

Title: Re: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: QUADROPHENIA on July 30, 2005, 01:31 PM

forks are 88

Title: Re: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: dordymush on July 30, 2005, 01:40 PM

sad ANORAKS all round i think  ;D.

Title: Re: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: aditup on July 30, 2005, 01:46 PM

I did say it was post 86/87, just didn't know when they changed to those forks, 86 or 87. Ad

Title: Re: Why very few bids, whats wrong with it?
Post by: ORB on July 30, 2005, 02:23 PM

so, we are all correct ;)