gfxgfx
 
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
975594 Posts in 138926 Topics by 6348 Members - Latest Member: Dannygee June 05, 2024, 12:41 PM
*
gfx* Home | Portal | Forum | Merchandise | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Old School BMX 1980 - 1988  |  Old School Freestyle (frame stands and kickturns galore!)  |  original condition vs restored
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: original condition vs restored  (Read 2705 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ameobic dysentry

  • Guest
original condition vs restored
« on: September 28, 2006, 03:29 PM »
'ello there,

Got to say that I do prefer the look of survivor bikes before they get all done up, powdercoated with shiny new tyres that will never touch dirt again.  Its just a personal preference but I think that when they are in their original state with all the scratches, random stickers and mismatched parts, they reflect the history of the bike better - they all tell a story about the history of the bike and I think it is a shame when it all gets painted over/replaced.  I can understand a restoration if the bike is totally wrecked, but otherwise I think it can be kinda cool to keep it how it is.  Anyone got any bikes from back in the day that haven't been restored back to the impeccable factory spec?  I've posted this in the freestyle section cos I like all the random parts that you used to get on freestlyers ie mismatched tuffs, all sorts of clashing colours and parts, that accumulated over the life of the bike.

Offline jimmyp

  • Look Back
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2006, 03:33 PM »
I agree up to a certain point, like to keep all my bikes as original as poss ie parts ext  :daumenhoch:

SaMAlex

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2006, 03:51 PM »
I agree. i was just about to start stripping down a frame to get it re-painted but then I was looking at some pics of when I rode it and thought it would be better to keep it looking the same. I need to get hold of the same parts I used back then but its easier now cos Im not trying to make a bike that looks like new, just that looks like it did when I rode it, even down to the stickers of the time.

Offline harris

  • Founding Fathers
  • Hoffman's Love Child
  • *
  • Posts: 23607
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2006, 03:52 PM »

one in question and i do agree to a point but some just need to be rebuilt this is boarder line.

greentoad

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2006, 03:56 PM »
Dan

Don't you dare.....if you touch that, the history and soul of that bike will be lost forever.

Think about all the stickers, how could they ever be replaced or replicated. And I doubt very much if you could get a lot of the parts / items undone without them snapping / breaking / rounding off. The seat clamp is a one off with the rough sawn edges too, plus all the drill holes, welds etc etc.

 :10_2_12:

J.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2006, 03:58 PM by greentoad »

Offline harris

  • Founding Fathers
  • Hoffman's Love Child
  • *
  • Posts: 23607
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2006, 03:58 PM »
only messin mr toad   :D  its stayin as it is.  :)

ameobic dysentry

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2006, 04:10 PM »

DR VINOAH

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2006, 04:18 PM »
i would rather walk on broken glass bare footed

than see harris restore that genaration uno haro :4_17_5:

im gonna petition the UN ,and have the H man put under house arrest :daumenhoch:

i have the same predicament with the MXII ,im doing for me neighbour

i would leave it as i found it,

 like this




,but i wanna have a go as well

and the owner,wants it looking like this

 

but i dont think thats 2 drastic a change between the two pix :angel:

and back to rOm its home :4_17_5:

for some lazy sunday sessions
« Last Edit: September 28, 2006, 04:21 PM by VINOAH,S ARK »

Offline brass monkey!

  • BMX Overlord
  • ***********
  • Posts: 14392
  • BRASS MONKEY, JUNKIE, THAT FUNKY MONKEY !
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2006, 04:22 PM »
Dan - they should put that bike in the TATE mate !!  ;)

Its a work of art !!
MONKEYBISCUITS RIP !!

Offline Stodgy

  • BMX Overlord
  • ***********
  • Posts: 15931
    • RADBMX Shop
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2006, 04:24 PM »
What, you mean like this:




DR VINOAH

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2006, 04:28 PM »
ps

dans haro if not already

should be one of radbmx,s mascots

along with the 24K gold hutch and some others i cant think of @ the mo :angel:

Offline harris

  • Founding Fathers
  • Hoffman's Love Child
  • *
  • Posts: 23607
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2006, 04:28 PM »
cool ass performer im likin that as it is or was..who remember this it was a pos when it arrived deffo restoration the bench mark house hold paint styley.

ameobic dysentry

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2006, 06:40 PM »




I like this alot Stodgy - many thanks for the photos everyone


Offline Steve P

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3045
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2006, 06:55 PM »
I'd like to get my hands on that Gen1 and restore it . . . hefty project with the gusset weld though I do like a challenge

Give me first dib dobs if you decide to sell it Dan :daumenhoch:

Steve

Offline Waxintaxin

  • Team Owner
  • Cherry Picker
  • *
  • Posts: 1090
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2006, 07:05 PM »
Difficult one

A bashed up frame that means nothing to me is screaming to be restored  but i ride them and all the scars are my scars so i guess that counts a bit

Rich :)

othomas2

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2006, 10:27 PM »
Probably not what you are looking for but.... here's my only survivor.

Totally agree with what you are saying too.  ;)


gmac

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2006, 11:08 PM »
Nowt wrong with either restored or original, but you can't beat a decent survivor  ;)



SaMAlex

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #17 on: September 28, 2006, 11:30 PM »
I saw that gen 1 when it was being sold, then the guy put up some pics of him riding it way back. The bike was exactly the same! It was so cool. It really made me sad that he was selling it. I dont know the guy but it was almost like he was selling the photos of his youth. He cant have needed the money or the space that bad!

DR VINOAH

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #18 on: September 28, 2006, 11:44 PM »
Nowt wrong with either restored or original, but you can't beat a decent survivor  ;)




thats real sweet guy :daumenhoch:

"swoop" rupe testing the pro class two four






Offline Bob_Acid

  • Team Admin
  • BMX Overlord
  • *
  • Posts: 17364
  • It's Bronked
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2006, 03:35 AM »
i like the best of both worlds. At MK this year we had them all; the show and shine bikes restored or NOS plus all the NOS parts about looking like an 80's bike shop but with the untold survivors and semi restored riders laying about covered in track dirt it looked like any track or trails would have. i just love milling about soaking in all that nostalga  :daumenhoch:

I'd hate to see all the  mingĂ«rs restored as much as i'd hate to see all the NOS and restored bikes used and abused. The balance looks about right from where i'm sitting :)

I love it all me ;)


« Last Edit: September 29, 2006, 03:38 AM by Bob_Acid »

Reggie

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #20 on: September 29, 2006, 10:18 AM »
cool ass performer im likin that as it is or was..who remember this it was a pos when it arrived deffo restoration the bench mark house hold paint styley.


Damn that looks like some 14 years old school metalwork project... YUK!

Offline harris

  • Founding Fathers
  • Hoffman's Love Child
  • *
  • Posts: 23607
  • Rated:
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #21 on: September 29, 2006, 10:23 AM »
yes your right but wave the magic  stick and ha presto   :LolLolLolLol:.still a strange one thou.

ameobic dysentry

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #22 on: September 29, 2006, 11:35 AM »



Yep I think this one does qualify for a resto - I think when a bike has been painted with red hamerite it has lost its 'original charm'. 

Coastvl

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #23 on: September 29, 2006, 01:21 PM »
You've all seen these before but here they are. Both are survivors of mine from early on in life. Some new bits like grips and tires but thats about it. The supergoose now has new AME"S too.


duncan

  • Guest
Re: original condition vs restored
« Reply #24 on: September 29, 2006, 01:42 PM »
Fantastic!
Your climate over there can only help to preserve them too.

RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Old School BMX 1980 - 1988  |  Old School Freestyle (frame stands and kickturns galore!)  |  original condition vs restored
 

gfxgfx
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal